Claude Docs rewrites a year-old SOP from a recorded walkthrough
1 month ago
Step two of this checklist says print and stamp every invoice. The person who runs the job has stopped printing. Claude Docs can line up an old checklist against the transcript of a walkthrough, and hand back every step that changed. An operations lead owns this kind of document. It's called an SOP, a standard operating procedure, the written how-we-do-it for one job. Each new vendor, approval step or hire makes the SOP a little more out of date. The company here is Bramblecote Home Supply. I made up the company, both files, and every person in them. The walkthrough is Carla Nwosu, the accounts payable specialist who pays the vendor bills, talking through the job as it runs today.
Ask about this presentation
Chapters
0:00The year-old invoice checklist no longer matches how the job is done
0:37Anthropic’s SOP template gives the exceptions a table of their own
1:04Four kinds of disagreement fall out when each old step is matched to the walkthrough
1:56Claude’s comparison table caught every disagreement planted in the two files
2:31The checklist, the transcript and a one-sentence request go into Claude Docs
3:02The draft fills every template section, even where the two files leave a question open
3:41Claude ruled on every disagreement, and each ruling is still the ops lead’s call
4:19Claude Docs has no version history yet, so keep a copy before you edit
4:38Type the approval limit from the finance policy itself, not from either file
5:10Most of the 25 Claude Docs minutes go to checking the draft and ruling the rows
5:37The rewritten SOP starts from how Carla runs the job today
Show transcriptHide transcript
Step two of this checklist says print and stamp every invoice. The person who runs the job has stopped printing. Claude Docs can line up an old checklist against the transcript of a walkthrough, and hand back every step that changed. An operations lead owns this kind of document. It's called an SOP, a standard operating procedure, the written how-we-do-it for one job. Each new vendor, approval step or hire makes the SOP a little more out of date. The company here is Bramblecote Home Supply. I made up the company, both files, and every person in them. The walkthrough is Carla Nwosu, the accounts payable specialist who pays the vendor bills, talking through the job as it runs today.
Anthropic publishes a template for this kind of document. The template is a skill file for Claude, meaning a written set of instructions Claude follows for one kind of job. The file's tip says the most valuable part to write down is, usually we do X, but sometimes Y. A checklist records the usually. The sometimes comes out when someone talks the job through. Screen recorders like Scribe and Tango turn the clicks of one run into a list of steps. A recorder never saw your old checklist, so a recorder can't show you what changed.
The table I asked for lists every step where the checklist and the walkthrough disagree. To build it, Claude pairs each checklist step with what Carla does at that point in the walkthrough. Four kinds of disagreement come out of that. The first kind is a dropped step. The checklist says print and stamp, and Carla says nothing gets printed. The second kind is a new step. Two vendors stopped emailing their invoices in March, so Carla now downloads them from each vendor's website every Monday and Thursday. The third kind is a changed order. The checklist enters each invoice in NetSuite, the accounting system, and then checks it against the purchase order, the form that says what the company agreed to buy. Carla checks first, because a bad invoice entered early has to be cancelled later. The fourth kind is an exception. Carla says, usually there's a purchase order, but if there isn't one, I don't enter it at all. The first three kinds show the checklist going stale. The exception is the kind the checklist never had.
Before the run, I wrote down seven disagreements and hid them in the two files. They were two dropped steps, one new step, one changed order, two exceptions and one approval limit. An approval limit is the dollar amount above which a second person has to sign off on a bill. On my run, Claude's table came back with seven rows, and every one of the seven lines up with something I hid. The new website step sits inside the row for step one, collecting invoices. Each row of that table is one question for the ops lead. Is the walkthrough the new rule, or a habit that should stop? The lead answers it in a few seconds per row, and the SOP is those answers written out.
Claude Docs is Anthropic's new document editor inside Claude. You ask, and Claude writes a doc you can edit. I typed slash docs in the message box and attached the two files. The walkthrough went in as its transcript, a text file of what Carla said. Then I typed one sentence. Using the old checklist and the walkthrough transcript, write the current SOP in the template below and add a table of every step where the two disagree. Under that sentence I pasted Anthropic's template. Claude Docs is in beta. It's on by default on the Pro, Max and Team plans. On Enterprise, an owner has to switch it on first.
Claude wrote the draft in eighty seconds, and I timed it. The draft's exceptions table carries Carla's exceptions in Carla's words. Five lines in the draft come from neither file. The draft says the SOP gets reviewed every quarter. The draft lists what the process leaves out, like employee expense reports. The draft names who is accountable for each step. An exceptions row says a paper invoice from the post tray goes into NetSuite like any other invoice, and Carla's walkthrough never says how a paper letter gets there. The last is a new rule about raising workload concerns with the ops lead. Each of those five lines reads like a fact from the files.
Here is where I'd stop and read it myself. I asked for a table of disagreements. Claude added a column to that table, headed In this SOP, and ruled on every row. Four rows say the walkthrough is adopted. Two rows say the step is removed. The approval limit row says policy kept. Read that column as Claude's proposal. As the ops lead, I mark each row keep, stop or ask. Retiring print and stamp is a keep, because NetSuite stamps the date on its own now. The utility and software bills are an ask. Carla codes those bills straight to one expense account, from a list pinned in the finance channel. Before I adopt that, I want to know who owns the list. The approval limit row gets a stop, and a check of its own.
When the rows are ruled, the SOP leaves Claude Docs. On my account, the Export panel downloads Word, PDF or Markdown, and sends a copy to Google Docs or Notion. Anthropic's help page says there is no way back to an earlier draft for now. So save the old checklist, and download Claude's first draft before you change it.
Skip Claude for the approval limit. In the walkthrough, Carla usually skips the Controller's sign-off on bills under five hundred dollars. The Controller is the head of accounting. Claude caught that skip. Claude kept the checklist's limit of two hundred and fifty dollars and flagged the skip in its reply to me. Then the draft says the company's finance policy requires that limit. Claude never saw the finance policy. The limit and the policy's name both came from the year-old checklist. So the new SOP cites the policy as if someone had checked it this year. I open the finance policy myself and type the limit in by hand.
Both totals are estimates for this one SOP, and I timed only the draft. By hand, reading both files, lining them up, writing the SOP and deciding the seven rows takes about sixty-five minutes. The assisted run takes about twenty-five minutes, and eighty seconds of that is the draft itself. Thirteen of those minutes are spent reading the draft against both files and fixing the five lines with no file behind them. The last ten minutes go to the seven rows and the approval limit, the same ten minutes as by hand.
Back to step two, print and stamp. The new SOP's first step now tells the next person, do not print or stamp anything, and that line came straight from Carla's recording. As the ops lead, I ruled on every step that changed. Which checklist on your team still describes the job the way it ran a year ago?
Up next
5:36Claude Docs writes the weekly support trends note
@ai-at-work
1 month ago
5:56Claude Docs finds the last day to cancel 12 vendor contracts
@ai-at-work
1 month ago
5:21Claude Docs counts the themes in 400 survey answers
@ai-at-work
1 month ago
5:49Claude Docs compares three vendor quotes on three-year cost
@ai-at-work
1 month ago
5:10Claude Docs turns your team folder into a new hire onboarding plan
@ai-at-work
1 month ago
5:40Claude Cowork shows where your interview panel disagreed
@ai-at-work
1 month ago
5:56Claude Cowork drafts the 1:1 agenda from last week's notes
@ai-at-work
1 month ago
5:30Google Vids turns this week’s policy PDFs into a Friday catch-up video
@ai-at-work
2 months ago
5:41Claude Cowork drafts the security questionnaire from last year’s folder
@ai-at-work
2 months ago
2:21Turn a messy meeting transcript into a decision memo — before the next meeting
@ai-at-work
2 months ago