A PR explainer video, from one comment
This is a pull request explainer, and Opus 5.5 made all of it: the slides, the narration and the motion design, from the diff. Mention @bisque-cloud in a comment on a GitHub pull request, and Claude Code makes one like it, free within the Claude subscription you already have.
An example: claude-code-action #1607, explained

github.com/anthropics/claude-code-action/pull/1607
This example is for a public pull request in Anthropic's claude-code-action. A run capped at sixty turns ran seventy-three and still passed, and this change makes the cap hold. The explainer walks through the fix, then ends on what a reviewer should check, including one the pull request doesn't mention: writing the cap as the word sixty turns it off. It was made with the same present skill the mention runs, before the mention existed.
Ask for one in a pull request comment

Here's a real request, on a public test repository: a comment that says @bisque-cloud explain this. The eyes mean the run started. Once the repository has your Claude token, a reply links the explainer a few minutes later. This test repository has none, so it stopped at the eyes. And only people with write access can start one.
From a comment to a watch link
Here's the path. The mention starts a GitHub Actions workflow in your repository. Claude Code reads the change, on the plan you already pay for, the present skill writes the slides and narration, bisque-voice speaks it on the runner, and the link comes back as a reply.
Every explainer lands on your repository's own channel
Every explainer lands on your repository's channel

The workflow publishes with its own GitHub sign-in, so there's no Bisque account to make. Every explainer lands on your repository's own channel, under the same owner and repository path as on GitHub. This is the test repository's. A public repository's explainers are public, and a private one's are unlisted.
Setup: hand your agent the setup page

claude setup-token, so every run uses your plan.To set it up, hand your coding agent the GitHub setup page on bisque.today, and it adds the workflow. The part it leaves to you is signing in to Claude, so Claude Code runs free within the subscription you already have.
Before you turn it on
network: denyThe agent then reads their text with no shell and no internet.Before you turn it on. An explainer takes several minutes, and each one counts toward your plan's usage limits, like anything else you run in Claude Code. It runs only when someone with write access mentions it, so your plan is spent only when someone you trust asks. And if your repository takes pull requests from strangers, add network deny to the workflow. The agent then reads their text with no shell and no internet.
Which pull request would you explain first?
Which pull request would you want explained first?

Hand your agent the setup page, mention @bisque-cloud on a pull request, and your reviewers get a video they can watch before reading the diff. Which pull request would you want explained first?







